ports.x86-64.general (date)

ports.x86-64.general (date)

October 31, 2005

Re: [stable] Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system, Chris Wright

October 30, 2005

Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Work around Re: 2.6.14-git1 (and -git2) build failure on AMD64, Roland Dreier
Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Work around Re: 2.6.14-git1 (and -git2) build failure on AMD64, Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Work around Re: 2.6.14-git1 (and -git2) build failure on AMD64, Roland Dreier
[PATCH] x86_64: Work around Re: 2.6.14-git1 (and -git2) build failure on AMD64, Andi Kleen
Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system, Dave Jones

October 28, 2005

Re: x86_64: calibrate_delay_direct and apic id lift for BSP, Andi Kleen
Re: x86_64: calibrate_delay_direct and apic id lift for BSP, Yinghai Lu
RE: x86_64: calibrate_delay_direct and apic id lift for BSP, Lu, Yinghai
Re: x86_64: calibrate_delay_direct and apic id lift for BSP, Andi Kleen
x86_64: calibrate_delay_direct and apic id lift for BSP, Yinghai Lu

October 27, 2005

Re: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA, Magnus Damm
Re: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA, Magnus Damm
Re: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA, Magnus Damm

October 26, 2005

Re: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: DIE_GPF vs. DIE_PAGE_FAULT/DIE_TRAP, Jan Beulich
Re: DIE_GPF vs. DIE_PAGE_FAULT/DIE_TRAP, Andi Kleen
Re: DIE_GPF vs. DIE_PAGE_FAULT/DIE_TRAP, Jan Beulich
Re: DIE_GPF vs. DIE_PAGE_FAULT/DIE_TRAP, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA, Andi Kleen
DIE_GPF vs. DIE_PAGE_FAULT/DIE_TRAP, Jan Beulich
[rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: x86-64: Syncing dualcore cpus TSCs, David Lang

October 25, 2005

Re: [discuss] x86_64: 2.6.14 machine_emergency_restart, Andi Kleen
Re: x86-64: Syncing dualcore cpus TSCs, Andi Kleen
x86-64: Syncing dualcore cpus TSCs, Jonas Oreland
x86_64: 2.6.14 machine_emergency_restart, Yinghai Lu

October 24, 2005

[PATCH] x86_64: fix single step handling for 32bit processes, Peter Beutner

October 20, 2005

Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Yasunori Goto

October 19, 2005

Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Linus Torvalds
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Jon Mason
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Alex Williamson
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Yasunori Goto
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Alex Williamson
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Alex Williamson

October 18, 2005

Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Alex Williamson
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Alex Williamson
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Alex Williamson
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Linus Torvalds
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Linus Torvalds
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Yasunori Goto
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Yasunori Goto
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Yasunori Goto
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai

October 17, 2005

Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, David Lang
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Linus Torvalds
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andrew Morton
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Alex Williamson
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Arjan van de Ven
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Tony Luck
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Linus Torvalds
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Alex Williamson
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Russell King
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Muli Ben-Yehuda
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Muli Ben-Yehuda
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Christoph Lameter
Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Linus Torvalds
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Linus Torvalds
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Muli Ben-Yehuda
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Linus Torvalds
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Yasunori Goto
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Muli Ben-Yehuda
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andi Kleen
Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Andrew Morton
x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken, Ravikiran G Thirumalai

October 13, 2005

[Patch 2/2] x86, x86_64: fix Intel cache detection code assumption about threads sharing, Siddha, Suresh B
Re: [discuss] [Patch 1/2] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection fixes, Siddha, Suresh B
Re: [discuss] [Patch 1/2] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection fixes, Andi Kleen

October 12, 2005

Re: [discuss] [Patch 1/2] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection fixes, Siddha, Suresh B
Re: [discuss] [Patch 1/2] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection fixes, Andi Kleen
[Patch 2/2] x86, x86_64: fix Intel cache detection code assumption about threads sharing, Siddha, Suresh B
[Patch 1/2] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection fixes, Siddha, Suresh B
Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup, Siddha, Suresh B

October 11, 2005

Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, Jonas Oreland
Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, Vladimir B. Savkin
Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Joe Seigh
Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Andi Kleen
Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Andrew Morton

October 10, 2005

[PATCH for 2.6.14] i386: Don't discard upper 32bits of HWCR on K8, Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, Jonas Oreland
Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, Vladimir B. Savkin
Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, john stultz

October 08, 2005

Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH][Fix] swsusp: avoid possible page tables corruption during resume on x86-64, Rafael J. Wysocki
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH][Fix] swsusp: avoid possible page tables corruption during resume on x86-64, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup, Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, Vladimir B. Savkin
Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup, Siddha, Suresh B

October 07, 2005

Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, Velu Erwan
Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, Vladimir B. Savkin
Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup, Andi Kleen
Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup, Siddha, Suresh B

October 06, 2005

Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Linus Torvalds
Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Andrey Savochkin
Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Linus Torvalds
Re: [discuss] Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Eric Dumazet
Re: [discuss] Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Andi Kleen
Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Eric Dumazet
Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Andrey Savochkin
Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?), Andi Kleen
Re: [Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH][Fix] swsusp: avoid possible page tables corruption during resume on x86-64, Rafael J. Wysocki

October 05, 2005

[Patch] x86, x86_64: Intel HT, Multi core detection code cleanup, Siddha, Suresh B
Re: [PATCH][Fix] swsusp: avoid possible page tables corruption during resume on x86-64, Pavel Machek
[PATCH][Fix] swsusp: avoid possible page tables corruption during resume on x86-64, Rafael J. Wysocki
Re: Question regarding x86_64 __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT, Tejun Heo

October 04, 2005

Re: [discuss] [RFC][PATCH][Fix] swsusp: Yet another attempt to fix Bug #4959, Rafael J. Wysocki
Re: [NUMA , x86_64] Why memnode_shift is chosen with the lowest possible value ?, Eric Dumazet
Re: Question regarding x86_64 __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT, Andi Kleen
Re: Question regarding x86_64 __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT, Tejun Heo
Re: Question regarding x86_64 __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT, Andi Kleen
Re: Question regarding x86_64 __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT, Tejun Heo
Re: Question regarding x86_64 __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT, Andi Kleen
Re: [NUMA , x86_64] Why memnode_shift is chosen with the lowest possible value ?, Andi Kleen
Re: [discuss] [RFC][PATCH][Fix] swsusp: Yet another attempt to fix Bug #4959, Andi Kleen
Re: [RFC][PATCH][Fix] swsusp: Yet another attempt to fix Bug #4959, Rafael J. Wysocki

October 03, 2005

Re: [1/3] Add 4GB DMA32 zone, Coywolf Qi Hunt

October 02, 2005

Re: [RFC][PATCH][Fix] swsusp: Yet another attempt to fix Bug #4959, Rafael J. Wysocki
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH][Fix][Resend] Fix Bug #4959: Page tables corrupted during resume on x86-64 (take 3), Rafael J. Wysocki
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH][Fix][Resend] Fix Bug #4959: Page tables corrupted during resume on x86-64 (take 3), Siddha, Suresh B

October 01, 2005

Re: [RFC][PATCH][Fix] swsusp: Yet another attempt to fix Bug #4959, Andi Kleen
[RFC][PATCH][Fix] swsusp: Yet another attempt to fix Bug #4959, Rafael J. Wysocki
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH][Fix][Resend] Fix Bug #4959: Page tables corrupted during resume on x86-64 (take 3), Rafael J. Wysocki
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH][Fix][Resend] Fix Bug #4959: Page tables corrupted during resume on x86-64 (take 3), Rafael J. Wysocki
Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH][Fix][Resend] Fix Bug #4959: Page tables corrupted during resume on x86-64 (take 3), Siddha, Suresh B

News | FAQ | advertise