|
Re: Sheridan and the SSP: msg#00042politics.socialism.wsm.general
All meeting and decisions should open to the memberships and to the workers. The opposite sound like the secrecy of the Vanguard parties On 8/9/06, alan johnstone <ajsc21755@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The last people that SSP members should be listening to in the fall-out > of the fall out in the Scottish Socialist Party are the SWP and CWI who have > now swooped down like vultures to pick at the flesh of the bones of the SSP > . > > All we have heard recently is how the ex-Glorious Leader triumphed over > the Party apparatchiks and how he now once again lays claim to his > birth-right as Glorious Leader . > Of all the commentaries i have heard or seen or read , one issue seems to > be have been over -looked by most and that is the structure of a political > party and how the membership controls and directs their party. > The court case of Tommy Sheridan revealed secret minutes of EC meetings , > which resembled more a Star Chamber Inquisition . > During the court case , Colin Fox , the current Party Convenor , testified > that he would have willingly lied to cover up Sheridan's indiscretions . In > effect , to blatantly lie to his members and to his voters . > > Our politics in the ( leader-less ) SPGB is that regardless of potential > problems , open-ness is a necessary requisite for the party of the working > class . Consequently , the minutes of our EC meetings are posted on our > web-site for all and sundry to read . Our actual EC meeting are held in > public for anyone who cares to observe . Even the EC , itself , is forbidden > from proposing motions to conference or making policy . > > THAT IS our commitment to party democracy . > THAT IS one of our ways of maintaining membership control of our party . > THAT IS the lesson of the Tommy Sheridan court case . > And THAT IS the message we have to ram home to the SSP members . > > Neither the SSP-United Left or the SSP-Majority camps intend to change the > structure of their party . > We should be explaining what the alternative can be to the SSP membership > and its voters . ( Those associated with WIC also share with the SPGB the > principle that it's not just the ends but the means which are of equally > importance in the workers movement and so they share in that task .) > > "I don't want you to follow me or anyone else. I would not lead you into > the promised land if I could, because if I could lead you in, somebody else > would lead you out." - Eugene Debs > > " I'm not a charismatic speaker, and if I had the capacity to be one I > wouldn't. I'm really not interested in persuading people. What I like to do > is help people persuade themselves. " - Noam Chomsky > > " He who is morally impressed by power is never in a critical mood, and he > is never a revolutionary character " - Erich Fromm > > " Historically, the errors committed by a truly revolutionary movement are > infinitely more fruitful than the infallibility of the cleverest Central > Committee. " - Rosa Luxemburg > > alan johnstone , edinburgh br > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Sheridan and the SSP: 00042, alan johnstone |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Towards Ecological Catastrophe: 2016 or Socialism: 00042, balmer_dave |
| Previous by Thread: | Sheridan and the SSPi: 00042, alan johnstone |
| Next by Thread: | Bono - hypocrite or wise investor ???: 00042, alan johnstone |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |