|
All Not So Quiet On The Middle Eastern Front.: msg#00028politics.socialism.wsm.general
There are two views on the causes of this war. By far the most common, which is the one adopted by the "left" and the "right" alike, is that it concerns some kind of moral crusade, a battle of principles whether or not they are noble or ignoble depends on which side of the divide you are on. This type of idea has been adequately expressed recently from the "left" as follows; { The awesome and disproportionate military superiority of Israel at the regional scale, doubled with the blind and unconditional support of the United States is one of the key problems of the Middle East crisis. There has to be some kind of a balance of power. It is very unfortunate to express it this way but one has to have the frankness to express it: the very logic and strategy followed until now by Israel needs a "balance of terror", a "deterrence" capacity against the systematic resort to "disproportionate" aggressions or retaliations. This is the only way left for bringing Israel to an acceptable compromise with all the Arabs, especially the Palestinians, and that does not leave it freehanded in destroying its neighbours every time a problem arises. The West, in general but particularly meaning western governments, has to abandon the dogma of the moral superiority of Israel over the Arabs altogether, the myth of the only democracy in the Middle East that stands as the ultimate barrier of the "Civilized World" against the threat of "Muslim Terror". The Western powers have to come back to a more balanced view where the different protagonists are treated as equally "valued" parties in a conflict that has to be resolved through negotiation and compromise. But a compromise that does not wipe out the whole history of the conflict and try to impose an "accomplished fact" achieved solely through military superiority and so called moral superiority in the name of an eternal "divine right of Israel to unilaterally define its borders and then defend them"} http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14384.htm This kind of analysis of the situation is probably sincerely held by most of the working class involved and adopted by the ruling class on both sides of the conflict for their convenience. The alternative view is that, for the ruling class, this present slaughter is just the present arena for a global economic power struggle between two gangs of competing capitalists that have set their dogs on each other in a savage struggle. Wars, and this is certainly one of them, are not fought and supported by the capitalist class over "blind dogma" and issues of "moral superiority" that do not concern them, but over the only thing that does matter, that they see clearly and are very much focused on, money and power. At present the US/Western power block dominates the Middle East through the combined use of compliant client states like Saudi, Egypt etc, along with its ever expanding principal enforcer and "hit man" of the region, Israel. The necessity for the US power block's only military colony in the region to consolidate and expand its position by oppressing a culturally alien and potentially hostile section of its population is its Achilles heel. The natural concern, compassion and sympathy for the plight of the Palestinians by the indigenous working class of the region is an opportunity for the ruling class of the opposing power block to obtain control over the Middle East by inciting and providing them with the means to eject the incumbents. The professed concern and support of the Syrian and Iranian ruling class for the Palestinians will be as sincere and have a similar nature and reason to the US support of the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan in 1979 and that other well known philanthropist, Saddam Hussien`s support of the Palestinians in the past. It wasn't all that long ago that Assad's Syria was "rendering" suspected Moslem fundamentalist for torture for the US and violently repressing oppressed minorities of their own. The Zbigniew Brzezinski's, President Carter's and director of the CIA, Robert Gates, "Afghan Trap" is being re played back by the Iranians and Syrians who had no doubt observed and learned this model lesson. Probably to be renamed and boasted about in the future if "successful" as the "Palestinian Trap". http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7323.htm The West, just like the USSR were, are well aware of what they are being drawn into and we will probably continue to hear more empty rhetoric from the likes of Tony Bliar on the need for an equitable Palestinian solution and such like in an attempt to ameliorate its consequences. The unpopular Western backed puppet ruling class in Saudi and Egypt etc fearing that they will be replaced in a popular revolt incited by the western backed oppression of the Palestinians will be forced to make similar gestures. The bait or cannon fodder will probably never realise what they really died for. What is going on now is probably the opening rounds of a widely predicted conflict between the ruling class of both power blocks contestinting for control of the region. An attack on Iran by the Western power block has been considered by the military strategists of the Pentagon for sometime along with the possible reactions open to the Iranian ruling class. Two possibilities were the closing of the Straits of Hormuz by military action and direct and indirect intervention in Iraq. The third option was as outlined below by the Oxford Research Group in February 2006; {Hezbollah. Iran would be likely to encourage more militant action by Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon. Given that Hezbollah now has large quantities of surface-to-surface missiles of a range sufficient to reach Haifa and other population centres in the north of Israel, a vigorous Israeli response should be expected, further adding to an atmosphere of crisis. It is true that Hezbollah is currently undergoing a period of substantial political transformation, moving more firmly into the social and political arenas, so that major military action against Israel would be a regression to previous patterns. This is to be expected, though, given the likely extent of the popular support for Iran resulting from US military action. Any action from Hezbollah would result in substantial Israeli military responses. At the very least these would involve air strikes, the use of artillery and battlefield missiles and naval bombardment. They might extend to cross-border operations by infantry and armoured units.} http://www.iranbodycount.org/ It is possible that what we are seeing now is an attempt to neutralise a potential retaliatory reaction by the Iranians before the major conflict begins or at least a test of strengh to see who blinks first. It is important for the "left" and everyone else involved in this conflict to realise before taking sides that there are powerful dark forces and hidden hands manipulating events for their own malevolent ends that are of no interest to those that are doing the dying. Before people start inciting others to kill and die and handing out white feathers they need to disengage themselves from the idea that for everyone involved on one side of this war that it is just about defending "plucky little Belgium from the marauding Hun" and to a least understand that they are also being "used" by others for their own evil ends. As to; "There has to be some kind of a balance of power. It is very unfortunate to express it this way??." It certainly is unfortunate, it was this kind of "logic" of the balance of power between the ruling class of opposing power blocks that led to the bloodbath of the first world war were British workers fought for a "Land fit for Kings". Only to endure death or the grinding poverty of the great depression for the "victorious" that survived. As Gospel New Testament allusions are back in vogue, I shall quote a Chomsky quote from; http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14221.htm "false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravening wolves. By their fruits ye shall know them." The full quote is of course from Matthew 7.15; "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravening wolves. 7:16 By their fruits ye shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but the corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit." So perhaps before the working class start plucking ideas from elsewhere they should consider which type of trees are giving them up. On another type of grape; {Operation Grapes of Wrath (Hebrew: îáöò òðáé æòí) is the Israeli Defense Forces code-name for a sixteen-day military blitz against Lebanon in 1996 in an attempt to crush the Lebanese resistance to Israel's occupation of South Lebanon. Israel conducted more than 1,100 air raids and extensive shelling (some 25,132 shells). A UN installation was also hit by Israeli shelling causing the death of 118 Lebanese civilians (see Qana shelling). (Amnesty 1996) 639 Hezbollah cross-border rocket attacks targeted northern Israel, particularly the town of Kiryat Shemona. (HRW 1997) Hezbollah forces also participated in numerous engagements with Israeli and South Lebanon Army forces. The conflict was de-escalated on 27 April by a ceasefire agreement banning attacks on civilians.} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Grapes_of_Wrath |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Is God going to turn Supergrass?: 00028, Julian Vein |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | All Not So Quiet On The Middle Eastern Front: 00028, Citizens of the World |
| Previous by Thread: | SSP - Sheridani: 00028, alan johnstone |
| Next by Thread: | All Not So Quiet On The Middle Eastern Front: 00028, Citizens of the World |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |