osdir.com
mailing list archive

Subject: A WorldNetDaily.com article from hugh-rNFqB+5AcH10ubjbjo6WXg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - msg#00001

List: politics.leftists.monkeyfist

Date: Prev Next Index Thread: Prev Next Index
You have been sent this message from Hugh Redmon
(hugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) as a courtesy of WorldNetDaily.com (http://www.worldnetdaily.com).

Get ready for thehoopla, they founbd another al-Qaida tape Hugh Redmon

To view the entire article, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28819

Wednesday, September 4, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------------
New al-Qaida training tape shows another side of terror
By Joseph Farah
------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: September 4, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern

An al-Qaida training videotape, captured in Afghanistan, shows Osama bin Laden's terrorists are not only planning attacks with weapons of mass destruction but are preparing to kill Americans with drive-by shootings and home break-ins, through ambushes of law-enforcement officers and targeted assassinations on golf courses, WorldNetDaily has learned.

The videotape was produced, U.S. analysts believe, for al-Qaida's internal use and did not appear to be an external propaganda device.

U.S. intelligence considers the tape much more significant in what it reveals about al-Qaida's modus operandi than the highly publicized video purchased and broadcast last month by CNN. U.S. forces found a cache of 64 al-Qaida tapes while combing caves and hideouts in Afghanistan. Analysts were surprised by some of what they saw in the latest video and believe they employ terrorist tactics and techniques meant for export to America and other nations.

"None of these training scenarios depicts the type of fighting that al-Qaida engages in within Afghanistan," noted John Holschen of Insights Training Center, who produced a report on the tape for military and law enforcement officials.

The training video shows al-Qaida operatives practicing the following kinds of assaults:

  • using pickup trucks with shooters concealed in the bed of the trucks;
  • using motorcycles as a shooting platform for drive-bys and assassinations;
  • execution of prisoners;
  • ambushes of law-enforcement officers;
  • residential assassinations;
  • assassination on a golf course using a rocket-propelled grenade and rifle fire;
  • drive-up kidnapping of target walking on a street;
  • use of tunnels, storm drains and sewers for infiltration during urban raids;
  • rappelling from rooftops of buildings to make entry on upper floors;
  • use of motorcycles for grenade attacks; and
  • raids on buildings with large numbers of occupants ? perhaps schools or office buildings.

Analysts point out that all scenarios involving prisoners and hostages ended in execution. None included plans for negotiated settlements for escape by terrorists.

"They plan to kill the prisoners and die in place," wrote Holschen.

The "perfect day" as seen by al-Qaida would combine attacks designed to produce a maximum number of casualties with attacks that would give them the opportunity to get "face time" on the news channels to deliver their rhetoric, explained Holschen.

"The major take-home lesson here is that although the enemy is known to be seeking the ability and opportunity to use weapons of mass destruction and of an unconventional nature, such as hijacked airliners, they are also spending a lot of time training to carry out attacks the old-fashioned way ? attacks executed by small groups of dedicated personnel equipped with little more than small arms," explained Holschen.

Hostages, prisoners and anyone else identified as a target or problem by al-Qaida terrorist operatives will be killed, say those who viewed the tape. There is no point in complying with orders, they say. Those who do not resist ultimately will be rewarded with ritual execution in front of television cameras, according to the tactics and techniques captured on this video.

In one scenario on the video, terrorists pretend to be stranded on a six-lane highway, their vehicle disabled. When a police officer stops to assist, the driver blows his horn. Another occupant of the vehicle opens fire on the police officer with a rifle. In other scenarios, shooters were concealed in the trunk of the car. When the terrorists were picked up by accomplices in a getaway car, the original vehicle was blown up, apparently to destroy evidence.

In another scenario, an innocuous-looking terrorist knocks on the door of a residence, standing in view of the resident and answering questions through a closed door. When the resident opens the door, the terrorist immediately draws his weapon and fires, emptying his weapon into the victim.

In the golf course assassination, the target was on the green, near the hole. A rocket-propelled grenade is fired at a vehicle adjacent to the green, perhaps a security detail. Then the target of the assassination is killed with rifle fire.

When asked if these techniques are intended for use in the U.S., one military intelligence operative said without hesitation, "Yes."

If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WorldNetDaily poll.

© 2002  



Joseph Farah is editor and chief executive officer of WorldNetDaily.com.



------------------------------------------------------------------
Was this page helpful?
Yes No
Thread at a glance:

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Reply to website article

> >Dear Sir: > West's existence seems to be entirely dependent upon stirring up > racial unrest. That's absurd; West's training and much of scholarly output is in philosophy; in fact, he's published less on the philosophy of race and racism than many, many other scholars. Oh, except you probably mean to say that as a professor of Afro-American studies, the only thing he does is "stir up racial unrest" by educating students about, for example, the history of African Americans. Yes, I suppose that, from what you give every impression is your viewpoint about these issues, the truth is a very dangerous thing. > How does a man&nbsp;of such limited appeal - > <EM>outside of the protected netherworld of academia</EM> - Academia, in toto, is a "protected netherworld"? I don't even know what that means. I have the vaguest inkling that you mean to activate one of the standard right-wing rants about the university, political correctness, so-called cultural marxism, and all that rot. How boring. And beside the point. But, come on, if you're gonna bash mindlessly, you should at least get the buzzwords right. "protected netherworld" is simply gibberish. > succeed in > assembling&nbsp;a following&nbsp;of seemingly otherwise intelligent > people as yourself. Hey, you damn with feint praise -- how clever! I'm "otherwise intelligent" but not *really* since I am, or so you think, part of West's "following". So, lemme get this straight: if a person finds West compelling or interesting (or merely worth reading), the person is ipso facto unintelligent? That's sorta a limited litmus test, isn't it? As for why people pay attention to West, maybe you should consider the fact that so many people do -- his first year course in A-A studies at Harvard was *the single most popular course on campus* -- to be a bit of falsification of your thesis that he's -- how would you put it? -- "entirely dependent on stirring up racial unrest". Comparisons to Einstein are outrageous and > disgraceful.&nbsp; Wow, you've got all that pent-up racism *and* you can't read for shit. The comparison to Einstein was about Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study, which nicely refutes a lot of the nonsense spread about West. It's interesting that you try to distort the plain meaning of what I wrote; people who piss and moan about the "protected netherworld of academia" are typically the kind of people who fetishize The Truth, which they think they can wield as some kind of ideological weapon against those whom they take to be the Evil Proponents of Political Correctness. Which is ironic since just about every message I get from a right-winger "criticizing" something I've written is full of these kind of obvious distortions and fabrications. The Truth is only worth something when you think it's a bludgeon against your political opponents. This really is the archetypal right-wing move, the kind of thing Ann Coulter has raised to an art form. The hypocrisy is stunning. However, the comparison isn't as completely untoward as you seem to think: Einstein and West are both powerful *socialist* thinkers, though I would be the second to concede that as far as epoch-making intellectuals, Einstein is light years ahead of West, who'd be the *first* to concede it, of course. > Why does such a committed social reformer as West run&nbsp;away from > his accusers when challenged to defend his intellectual integrity and > work&nbsp;ethic?&nbsp;&nbsp;I believe it is because he has neither > integrity nor ethics. Yes, you clearly believe that; but you're just as clearly wrong in that belief. If you really don't understand why West refuses to defend himself against baseless, racially-suspect, prima facie absurd allegations about "work ethic", then there's nothing I could say to explain it to you. Lemme put it this way: how many books and multimedia projects did *you* complete while battling prostate cancer? And if you don't get the point of the question, that's an indication that you don't know what the hell you're talking about, that you lack essential, relevant facts, and that you're making a fool of yourself. Kendall Clark

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

The "other" September 11

[Background information: "Serving the Few" by Michael Parenti: http://www.sonic.net/~doretk/Issues/96-08%20AUG/servingthefew.html] Reuters (with additional material by AP). 8 September 2002. Chile coup anniversary protest turns violent. SANTIAGO -- Protesters hurling Molotov cocktails clashed with police in the center of the Chilean capital on Sunday at an anniversary commemoration for leftists killed after Gen. Augusto Pinochet took power in a 1973 coup. Witnesses said police fired tear gas and water cannons at protesters, some of whom were hooded, on a march to a monument in Santiago's General Cemetery. Violence is common at the annual protest, which marks the death of an estimated 3,000 people killed by the armed forces after Pinochet overthrew leftist President Salvador Allende on Sept. 11, 1973. While most of the 1,500 demonstrators peacefully marched more than 25 blocks from downtown Santiago to the city's main cemetery, small groups of masked youth started throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at stores, bank offices and at police. As the march went past the presidential palace, which was destroyed by air force jets during the coup, the demonstrators burned a U.S. flag. It was widely believed that the U.S. government and CIA supported the coup. Among the stores attacked by the demonstrators was a McDonald's restaurant, which was set on fire and had its windows smashed. The march ended at a memorial wall erected at the cemetery to honor hundreds of victims of repression during Pinochet's 1973-90 rule. Buried at the cemetery is Salvador Allende, the Marxist president toppled by Pinochet in the coup. At the cemetery and in nearby streets, some of the demonstrators renewed their violent protests, erecting barricades, and throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails. Police responded with water trucks and tear gas. Police Col. Jorge Carmona said eight demonstrators were detained. There was no reports of injuries. Both the army and leftist groups plan to hold small commemorations of the coup on Wednesday, when much of the world will be marking the first anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States. --*-- Marc Rodrigues Voicemail: 866.206.9067 x4217 Students for a Free Society: http://qcsfs.tripod.com "I cock back tha sling to stone a settler And breaks him off clean, call me the upsetter" -Zack de la Rocha

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: Reply to website article

> >Dear Sir: > West's existence seems to be entirely dependent upon stirring up > racial unrest. That's absurd; West's training and much of scholarly output is in philosophy; in fact, he's published less on the philosophy of race and racism than many, many other scholars. Oh, except you probably mean to say that as a professor of Afro-American studies, the only thing he does is "stir up racial unrest" by educating students about, for example, the history of African Americans. Yes, I suppose that, from what you give every impression is your viewpoint about these issues, the truth is a very dangerous thing. > How does a man&nbsp;of such limited appeal - > <EM>outside of the protected netherworld of academia</EM> - Academia, in toto, is a "protected netherworld"? I don't even know what that means. I have the vaguest inkling that you mean to activate one of the standard right-wing rants about the university, political correctness, so-called cultural marxism, and all that rot. How boring. And beside the point. But, come on, if you're gonna bash mindlessly, you should at least get the buzzwords right. "protected netherworld" is simply gibberish. > succeed in > assembling&nbsp;a following&nbsp;of seemingly otherwise intelligent > people as yourself. Hey, you damn with feint praise -- how clever! I'm "otherwise intelligent" but not *really* since I am, or so you think, part of West's "following". So, lemme get this straight: if a person finds West compelling or interesting (or merely worth reading), the person is ipso facto unintelligent? That's sorta a limited litmus test, isn't it? As for why people pay attention to West, maybe you should consider the fact that so many people do -- his first year course in A-A studies at Harvard was *the single most popular course on campus* -- to be a bit of falsification of your thesis that he's -- how would you put it? -- "entirely dependent on stirring up racial unrest". Comparisons to Einstein are outrageous and > disgraceful.&nbsp; Wow, you've got all that pent-up racism *and* you can't read for shit. The comparison to Einstein was about Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study, which nicely refutes a lot of the nonsense spread about West. It's interesting that you try to distort the plain meaning of what I wrote; people who piss and moan about the "protected netherworld of academia" are typically the kind of people who fetishize The Truth, which they think they can wield as some kind of ideological weapon against those whom they take to be the Evil Proponents of Political Correctness. Which is ironic since just about every message I get from a right-winger "criticizing" something I've written is full of these kind of obvious distortions and fabrications. The Truth is only worth something when you think it's a bludgeon against your political opponents. This really is the archetypal right-wing move, the kind of thing Ann Coulter has raised to an art form. The hypocrisy is stunning. However, the comparison isn't as completely untoward as you seem to think: Einstein and West are both powerful *socialist* thinkers, though I would be the second to concede that as far as epoch-making intellectuals, Einstein is light years ahead of West, who'd be the *first* to concede it, of course. > Why does such a committed social reformer as West run&nbsp;away from > his accusers when challenged to defend his intellectual integrity and > work&nbsp;ethic?&nbsp;&nbsp;I believe it is because he has neither > integrity nor ethics. Yes, you clearly believe that; but you're just as clearly wrong in that belief. If you really don't understand why West refuses to defend himself against baseless, racially-suspect, prima facie absurd allegations about "work ethic", then there's nothing I could say to explain it to you. Lemme put it this way: how many books and multimedia projects did *you* complete while battling prostate cancer? And if you don't get the point of the question, that's an indication that you don't know what the hell you're talking about, that you lack essential, relevant facts, and that you're making a fool of yourself. Kendall Clark

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

The "other" September 11

[Background information: "Serving the Few" by Michael Parenti: http://www.sonic.net/~doretk/Issues/96-08%20AUG/servingthefew.html] Reuters (with additional material by AP). 8 September 2002. Chile coup anniversary protest turns violent. SANTIAGO -- Protesters hurling Molotov cocktails clashed with police in the center of the Chilean capital on Sunday at an anniversary commemoration for leftists killed after Gen. Augusto Pinochet took power in a 1973 coup. Witnesses said police fired tear gas and water cannons at protesters, some of whom were hooded, on a march to a monument in Santiago's General Cemetery. Violence is common at the annual protest, which marks the death of an estimated 3,000 people killed by the armed forces after Pinochet overthrew leftist President Salvador Allende on Sept. 11, 1973. While most of the 1,500 demonstrators peacefully marched more than 25 blocks from downtown Santiago to the city's main cemetery, small groups of masked youth started throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at stores, bank offices and at police. As the march went past the presidential palace, which was destroyed by air force jets during the coup, the demonstrators burned a U.S. flag. It was widely believed that the U.S. government and CIA supported the coup. Among the stores attacked by the demonstrators was a McDonald's restaurant, which was set on fire and had its windows smashed. The march ended at a memorial wall erected at the cemetery to honor hundreds of victims of repression during Pinochet's 1973-90 rule. Buried at the cemetery is Salvador Allende, the Marxist president toppled by Pinochet in the coup. At the cemetery and in nearby streets, some of the demonstrators renewed their violent protests, erecting barricades, and throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails. Police responded with water trucks and tear gas. Police Col. Jorge Carmona said eight demonstrators were detained. There was no reports of injuries. Both the army and leftist groups plan to hold small commemorations of the coup on Wednesday, when much of the world will be marking the first anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States. --*-- Marc Rodrigues Voicemail: 866.206.9067 x4217 Students for a Free Society: http://qcsfs.tripod.com "I cock back tha sling to stone a settler And breaks him off clean, call me the upsetter" -Zack de la Rocha
Loading Comments...
Home | News | Patents | Sitemap | FAQ | advertise

Advertising by