logo       

Re: [plt-dev] cons*, why not?: msg#00025

plt-dev

Subject: Re: [plt-dev] cons*, why not?

We call it list*.

Carl Eastlund



On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Paulo J. Matos<pocmatos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I make some regular use of cons*. However, I always need to require it
> from srfi/1. Is there any reason why it's not included in the scheme
> language?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paulo Matos
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
>
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev

Google Custom Search

News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise