logo       

[plt-dev] cons*, why not?: msg#00024

plt-dev

Subject: [plt-dev] cons*, why not?

Hi all,

I make some regular use of cons*. However, I always need to require it
from srfi/1. Is there any reason why it's not included in the scheme
language?

Cheers,

Paulo Matos

_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise