oetting wrote:
>
>
> Rob Allen wrote:
>> The danger is that we might bloat the db adapters with stuff that is
>> rarely used. When I get some spare time, I'll tidy up the proof of
>> concept code that I wrote back when 0.1 was current and see what the
>> overhead actually is.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Rob...
>>
>>
>
> Yes you are right, it would not be used in all cases. The alternative is to
> have an entire extra set of adaptors for this functionality alone, this
> sertanly has its disadvantages as well.
I'll have to check my test code (as it's a little old now!) but I seem
to remember that I inherited from the current adapters to add the db
specific stuff I needed.
The concept code was written to cope with both MySQL and SQL Server in a
vague hope of avoiding putting something db specific "too high up".
I'll have a dig around between Christmas and New Year.
Regards,
Rob...
|
