oetting wrote:
> This would also require some cross-db datatypes like:
> string, text, integer, float, datetime, timestamp, time, date, binary,
> boolean
>
> I think these methods would be a nice adition to the db adapters. The
> describeTable method of the adapters already does some abstraction of schema
> information, why not go all the way?
>
The danger is that we might bloat the db adaptes with stuff that is
rarely used. When I get some spare time, I'll tidy up the proof of
concept code that I wrote back when 0.1 was current and see what the
overhead actually is.
Regards,
Rob...
|
