logo       
Google Custom Search
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

RE: Small bug w/ autoinit: msg#00196

Subject: RE: Small bug w/ autoinit
> From: liveuser-bounces-jG1DcbwcvVYUuug7z7PF4w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:liveuser-
> bounces-jG1DcbwcvVYUuug7z7PF4w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjoern Kraus
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: liveuser-bounces-jG1DcbwcvVYUuug7z7PF4w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:liveuser-bounces-jG1DcbwcvVYUuug7z7PF4w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> > Of

> > > I think this would make debugging this a lot easier, what
> > do you guys
> > > think?
> >
> > I'm all for it, i use DataObject quite heavily at work and it
> > saved me so much time to have the debugging feature !
> >
> 
> I don't agree here, 'cause debugging causes much if-statements and
blows
> up
> our smart code. Another point is that debugging is only necessary for
> developers that enhance the LU code not for those that just use the
class.
> If we have a bug free release there is no need for debugging 'cause
all
> works as expected.
> I'm using DBG for debugging and I really don't need a debugging
support in
> LU.
> 
> -1 here.

-1 here as well.
We should try to make debugging as easy as possible, but it is not such
a critical feature as it is in DataObject. DataObject is sort of a
development tool. LiveUser aims to be a drop in. So debugging doesn't
happen all that much.

So I would agree we should rather employ other methods for debugging
during development.

Regards,
Lukas



Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>