On Fri Sep 24, 2004 at 02:4341PM -0400, Greg Beaver wrote:
> Why not instead make it informational only, for RSS feeds and other
> automatic processing (pear info could display maintainers)
>
> <author>
> <name>Greg Beaver</name>
> [<email>cellog@xxxxxxx</email>]
> [<role>lead</role>]
> [other optional informational tags]
> </author>
>
> or
>
> <author name="Greg Beaver">
> [optional informational tags]
> </author>
>
> I'd prefer the second way, since you can
>
> <author name="Greg Beaver"/>
>
> no matter what, the pearweb role of a maintainer should not be
> changeable from within the package.xml, it introduces too many potential
> probelms at pearweb.
Why don't we come up with some easy validation methods for the website
that prevent such problems? I don't really see the advantage of
dropping the maintainer section at the moment.
--
- Martin Martin Jansen
http://martinjansen.com/
|
