|
Re: PHP snippets (once again): msg#00056php.drupal.documentation
Hi Kieran, you wrote on 07/05/2006 16:47:24: >> Dear doc team, >> >> I looked at several snippets yesterday and to my horror many of >> them contain *obvious*, major security holes. I've spoken with the >> leader of the security team (chx) and we agreed to unpublish all >> obviously insecure snippets, then have a discussion based on >> numbers (ok vs. not ok) and how to proceed. >> >> In the limited sample set I've reviewed until now > 50% of the >> snippets either >> >> - bypass 'access' security (sometimes titles, sometimes full nodes) >> - allow XSS >> - allow SQL injection >> - allow a combination of the above > >Snippets are driven by Fergus. Fergus, what do you want us to do? > >Kieran I haven't seen any insecure snippets Keiran, but, any *obvious* nasty ones should be removed. to answer your question "what do you want us to do?" I suggest we leave in the warning that is on every snippet that is submitted correctly and don't approve any handbook pages that have any *obvious* security holes. Fergus -- Pending work: http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/ List archives: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: PHP snippets (once again): 00056, Farsheed |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PHP snippets (once again): 00056, Karoly Negyesi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PHP snippets (once again)i: 00056, Sami Khan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PHP snippets (once again): 00056, Karoly Negyesi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |