Can we rule one way or the other...
CamelCase is currently recognised by the parser, period. It is
regurgitated from ReverseParser thanks to the 'origin="camel"' attribute
on link xml elements.
Do we need to lavish attention on providing intended-conversion for a
"wiki standard"?
Or can we leave the possibility of using CamelCase where it stands, in
which 'CamelCase' becomes a link to a page named "Camel Case". There is
also the possibility of improving the convention with a symbol for web
location, i.e. CamelCase@WebNumberOne or somesuch.
I'd like to close this issue on grounds of possible wiki fascism.
FreeWiki.
Regards,
Archie
P.S. No closure without discussing the above.
cmarble-jqHnx1hy4Dsdnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://cowiki.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=201
------- Additional comments from
cmarble-jqHnx1hy4Dsdnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Jun 21 09:40:39 -0700 2005
-------
Parser recognises CamelCase (attempting to link to document "Camel Case") and
reproduces links that were specified in CamelCase. i.e. it does not 'convert'
links.
Does the original problem still exist?
| 
