Re: [HACKERS] xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string

On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> As I said upthread, I think we can easily provide some extra  
> convenience functions which will do what you want. The only thing I  
> was really arguing about was the function name for such a gadget.

+1.

"xpath_string" does seem unfortunate, but I'm not offended by it. =)

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers