Re: [HACKERS] xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string

pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Another thing that is troubling is that more exotic types do not seem to
> be supported at all. For instance, in my example I used uuid, and if one
> substitutes "uuid()" for "text()" that doesn't work.
>
>   


text() is an XPath function, with well defined semantics that have no 
relation at all to types in a PostgreSQL sense. uuid() of course has no 
meaning in an XPath expression.

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers