Re: [HACKERS] xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
> This is really a usage question, which doesn't belong on -hackers.
 
Perhaps this sentence in the 8.4.0 docs should be amended or removed?:
 
"If you find that some of the functionality of this module is not
available in an adequate form with the newer API, please explain your
issue to pgsql-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that the deficiency can be
addressed."
 
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/xml2.html#AEN115231
 
-Kevin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers