Re: [HACKERS] SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5

Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:

> The vague consensus for syntax options was that the GUC
> 'lock_timeout' and WAIT [N] extension (wherever NOWAIT
> is allowed) both should be implemented.
> 
> Behaviour would be that N seconds timeout should be
> applied to every lock that the statement would take.

In http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/291.1242053201@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom argues that lock_timeout should be sufficient.  I'm not sure what
does WAIT [N] buy.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers