Re: segmented fusion - a-ha!

Eric Niebler wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
> > Eric Niebler wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Dan. I've created a new branch called SEGMENTED_FUSION_V2. (It 
> >
> > Ok, question: I wish to carry on with Spirit2 dev. It's currently in
> > Spirit's SVN. How do you suggest I proceed? Should I bring in a copy
> > of SEGMENTED_FUSION_V2 somewhere in my include path? Or would xpressive
> > work as is with plain Fusion?
>
>
> boost/xpressive/proto/fusion.hpp implements non-segmented proto ET tree 
> traversal for Fusion v1 and v2. But I don't think you'll be traversing 
> proto trees directly, since you'll be flattening them, right? So I don't 
> think it matters. Just use vanilla Fusion v2.

Ok. Thanks for the hint!

Cheers,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net



-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642