Re: segmented fusion - a-ha!

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Dan. I've created a new branch called SEGMENTED_FUSION_V2. (It 
>
> Ok, question: I wish to carry on with Spirit2 dev. It's currently in
> Spirit's SVN. How do you suggest I proceed? Should I bring in a copy
> of SEGMENTED_FUSION_V2 somewhere in my include path? Or would xpressive
> work as is with plain Fusion?


boost/xpressive/proto/fusion.hpp implements non-segmented proto ET tree 
traversal for Fusion v1 and v2. But I don't think you'll be traversing 
proto trees directly, since you'll be flattening them, right? So I don't 
think it matters. Just use vanilla Fusion v2.

--
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com


-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642