Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees

Hi!

Eric Niebler schrieb:
> But what
> Dave is saying is that the loop unrolling should be happening at a lower
> level, and for the *all* Fusion sequences. It should be baked into
> Fusion, so that nobody should have to hard-code their own unrolled loops
> as you're doing above. They'll just call the appropriate Fusion algorithm.

As I understand the discussion so far the goal (more or less) is:
 - user writes "a >> b >> c >> d"
 - proto: gives flattened et
 - in spirit: "parse_sequence(S s) { fusion::for_each(s, &parse); }"
 - in fusion: automated loop unrolling via for_each
 - user gets efficient code

right?

Frank



-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642