Re: Re: segmented fusion - a-ha!

Joel de Guzman wrote:
>Eric Niebler wrote:
>
>> I'm in need of a stable branch point. Looks like you've been applying
>> changes as a result of the review, and there is at least one problem.
>> You've added some references to the non-existent "detail::tag_of". This
>> should be "traits::tag_of". Patch attached. OK to commit?
>
>Oh, sure. please.
>
>Thanks!


detail::tag_of should be detail::tag_of (its not a defect). The problem is that 
since the sourceforge outage a variety of changes from just pre-review through 
to when sourceforge came back up have gone missing. I've got the changes 
locally, and I'm in the process of checking things back in, but it is a fiddly 
process as cvs is getting confused about the missing version numbers, so I'm 
taking my time about checking in the latest stuff. I think references to 
detail::tag_of were checked in before I noticed how out of sync cvs had become 
over the outage (diff doesn't identify all the diffs from what I can see, due 
to confusion over version numbers).

Sorry if this is proving a distraction, I'll aim to get things back in sync 
with my local copy shortly. All of this in on the FUSION_V2 branch, I've no 
idea if anything has happened on other branches.

Cheers
Dan





-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642