Re: segmented fusion - a-ha!

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
> > Joel, I've got a nice little pile of segmented Fusion code now. 
> > Perhaps we should have a branch for it. What do you think?
>
> Wouldn't it be better if we simply tag the branch and just add on
> top of the current FUSION_V2 branch? We'll need to do some
> post review tweaks there so, I anticipate lots of changes to
> the code that will likely cause lots of conflicts with your
> branch. Thoughts?


I'm a bit concerned about what happens when Fusion gets accepted. 
Chances are, the segmentataion support will only be half implemented 
when it comes time to check Fusion into Boost main CVS. Rather than 
inflict a half-baked thing on everyone, we'll probably want the 
segmentation support on a branch. That's why I think I should do my 
stuff on a separate branch now. I can deal with the merge conflicts later.

--
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642