|
Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: msg#00070parsers.spirit.devel
"Eric Niebler" <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Oh, of course. Duh, I knew that. :-) In that case I tend to agree with > you -- it's likely that the cost of the indirections would catch up to > us in the long run. Are there really indirections, as in, pointer dereferences, in a segmented fusion traversal? That doesn't smell right to me, at least not in the general case. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00070, Joel de Guzman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00070, Joel de Guzman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse treesi: 00070, Joel de Guzman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00070, Joel de Guzman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |