|
Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: msg#00059parsers.spirit.devel
Eric Niebler wrote: Joel de Guzman wrote: Well, so do unary (or even binary) holders that hold trivial items (like chars). So, actually, it is still cheap to hold a unary(unary(unary(unary....(char)))). Then, there's also the added indirection when you refer to the children. So instead of having the compiler optimize, you go through the reference(s). Maybe you can incorporate some kind of heuristics to detect "cheap" copy objects. Perhaps sizeof will do? Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: segmented fusion - a-ha!: 00059, Joel de Guzman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: segmented fusion - a-ha!: 00059, David Abrahams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse treesi: 00059, Eric Niebler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00059, Eric Niebler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |