|
Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: msg#00040parsers.spirit.devel
Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
That would be great, thanks Hartmut! IMO, we'll still need more realistic tests that take the cost of ET building into account, but it can only help to understand what the compiler is doing to Fusion algorithms with different sequence traversal strategies. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00040, Eric Niebler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00040, David Abrahams |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse treesi: 00040, Hartmut Kaiser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00040, Eric Niebler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |