|
Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: msg#00019parsers.spirit.devel
dan marsden wrote: ----- Original Message ---- It uses cons, yes, but it doesn't serialize the entire tree up front like my first approach did. Rather, it maintains a list only of the current node and its parents. No, I've not run any comparisons so far (it's still quite crude IMO, so the Yes. Code size would be interesting, too. Also, we should benchmark my first approach, which serialized the whole tree up front, just to see. You can find that implementation here: http://tinyurl.com/f4o8n. I'll have a look at doing some sort of comparison if I get chance in the next That'd be great! -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00019, dan marsden |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Fusion-V2-ifying proto parse trees: 00019, Hartmut Kaiser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse treesi: 00019, dan marsden |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pseudo code for composite parse algorithms: 00019, Joel de Guzman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |