|
| <prev next> |
Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: msg#00000parsers.spirit.devel
Joel de Guzman wrote: Eric Niebler wrote: Most cases? I disagree. Imagine using proto to build Blitz++ or MTL or the Physical Quantities library or .... Math is a pretty important domain where grouping most certainly does matter. Grouping matters in I/O, too. For example: std::cout << ("hello" << "world"); // oops! Don't let the unique properties of the Spirit DSEL bias you. If we are to have a reusable expression template library, it must be general. In Spirit, I want you to use proto, and I want to make it easy for you to do so. I'm willing to make changes, so long as they don't make proto a less general tool. I guess I still don't understand your requirements, so let's back up. Please tell me again why you want sequences flattened. It would be helpful if you could also tell me why the code I wrote to make proto trees Fusion sequences is insufficient. I'm sure we can figure something out. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00000, Joel de Guzman |
|---|---|
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fusion-ifying proto parse trees: 00000, Joel de Guzman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |