|
osdir.com mailing list archive |
|
Subject: Re: TST implementation - msg#00005List: parsers.spirit.develOn 9/13/05, Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Jose wrote: > > Anybody has compiled a todo list for the TST implementation ? > > I gave up using the TST as it is now, because of > performance issues I wasn't > able to resolve. But you're more then welcome to work on that. > > Can you elaborate ? What type of performance issues: TST > performance ? or implementation performance ? Mainly implementation performance. But this may be because I was trying to use the TST container as a drop in replacement for a std::map. I don't remember exactly what the concrete reason for the perfomance problems was, I it may have been because of the map compatible interface implemented on top of the genuine TST container. HTH Regards Hartmut ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Spirit-devel mailing list Spirit-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-devel Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date: click to view message previewRE: TST implementationJose wrote: > > Anybody has compiled a todo list for the TST implementation ? > > I gave up using the TST as it is now, because of > performance issues I wasn't > able to resolve. But you're more then welcome to work on that. > > Can you elaborate ? What type of performance issues: TST > performance ? or implementation performance ? Mainly implementation performance. But this may be because I was trying to use the TST container as a drop in replacement for a std::map. I don't remember exactly what the concrete reason for the perfomance problems was, I it may have been because of the map compatible interface implemented on top of the genuine TST container. HTH Regards Hartmut ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf Next Message by Date: click to view message previewRE: TST implementationJose wrote: > I'll study the code and will try to run some benchmarks. Ok, I'm interested to hear about your results, if only possible. > BTW, I saw in the spirit group info that you're interested in > spatial structures/GIS. Can you recommend a c++ r-tree > implementation for my own use ? Did you have a look at GiST (http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/)? It's the only decent implementation of spatial trees for C++ I know of. Regards Hartmut > > Thanks and regards > Jose > > > On 9/13/05, Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Jose wrote: > > > > Anybody has compiled a todo list for the TST > implementation ? > > > > I gave up using the TST as it is now, because of > > performance issues I wasn't > > able to resolve. But you're more then welcome > to work on that. > > > > Can you elaborate ? What type of performance issues: TST > > performance ? or implementation performance ? > > Mainly implementation performance. But this may be > because I was trying to > use the TST container as a drop in replacement for a > std::map. I don't > remember exactly what the concrete reason for the > perfomance problems was, I > it may have been because of the map compatible > interface implemented on top > of the genuine TST container. > > HTH > Regards Hartmut > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software > Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development > Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & > Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * > http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Spirit-devel mailing list > Spirit-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:Spirit-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php Previous Message by Thread: click to view message previewRE: TST implementationJose wrote: > > Anybody has compiled a todo list for the TST implementation ? > > I gave up using the TST as it is now, because of > performance issues I wasn't > able to resolve. But you're more then welcome to work on that. > > Can you elaborate ? What type of performance issues: TST > performance ? or implementation performance ? Mainly implementation performance. But this may be because I was trying to use the TST container as a drop in replacement for a std::map. I don't remember exactly what the concrete reason for the perfomance problems was, I it may have been because of the map compatible interface implemented on top of the genuine TST container. HTH Regards Hartmut ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf Next Message by Thread: click to view message previewRE: TST implementationJose wrote: > I'll study the code and will try to run some benchmarks. Ok, I'm interested to hear about your results, if only possible. > BTW, I saw in the spirit group info that you're interested in > spatial structures/GIS. Can you recommend a c++ r-tree > implementation for my own use ? Did you have a look at GiST (http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/)? It's the only decent implementation of spatial trees for C++ I know of. Regards Hartmut > > Thanks and regards > Jose > > > On 9/13/05, Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Jose wrote: > > > > Anybody has compiled a todo list for the TST > implementation ? > > > > I gave up using the TST as it is now, because of > > performance issues I wasn't > > able to resolve. But you're more then welcome > to work on that. > > > > Can you elaborate ? What type of performance issues: TST > > performance ? or implementation performance ? > > Mainly implementation performance. But this may be > because I was trying to > use the TST container as a drop in replacement for a > std::map. I don't > remember exactly what the concrete reason for the > perfomance problems was, I > it may have been because of the map compatible > interface implemented on top > of the genuine TST container. > > HTH > Regards Hartmut > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software > Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development > Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & > Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * > http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Spirit-devel mailing list > Spirit-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:Spirit-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php Loading Comments...
|
|
