|
|
Re: Persistence, UI, etc.: msg#00073
|
Subject: |
Re: Persistence, UI, etc. |
Lennart Regebro wrote:
The fundamental difference is that they haven't gotten rid of the
difference between persistent an non-persistent memory. They just made
the non-persistent memory survive an accidental power failure.
That means that the whole overhead thingy of having two different
concepts of memory is still existing.
I don't think so.
"There is an implicitly persistent, unified memory model. Main memory
has the same semantics as disk storage, and survives system
shutdown/restart."
Read http://www.eros-os.org/design-notes/ReviewingWhereWeStand.html,
section "Key ideas in EROS", point 3.
Pietro
|
| |
