|
Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes): msg#00094os.tunes
>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Little <jiml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Jim> btanksley@xxxxxxxx wrote: >> No, I don't know that -- in fact, I disagree stridently with it. >> A computer language is nothing BUT a UI. It's an interface >> between the programmer and the machine. Jim> I think what Laurent is getting at here is that the syntax of Jim> the language can be separated from the semantics of the Jim> language. I think Laurent's further point is that type Jim> annotations do not affect the semantics of the language, and Jim> thus they shouldn't be a part of the core language. However, Jim> they are useful, so they should be a "standard" extension. That's it. Thanks for stating that with so few words. [...] Jim> Anyway, I don't mean to speak for Laurent, but I thought I Jim> might be able to clear things up a bit. I think you did. -- Laurent Martelli martelli@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Slate for Tunes HLL?: 00094, Brian T. Rice |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes): 00094, Laurent Martelli |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes)i: 00094, Jim Little |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes): 00094, Laurent Martelli |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |