|
Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes): msg#00071os.tunes
>>>>> "John" == John Carter <cyent@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: John> The Bottom Line =============== John> The problem I foresee is that any HLL built on the LLL risks John> destroying these properties and hence something John> precious. ie. I would predict that for Tunes to succeed in its John> stated aims the HLL _will_ be exactly the LLL, but with a John> excellent suite of library routines. I think I agree with this. I don't see the point to having a LLL and a HLL. But I think we need fancy GUI so that the language can be user friendly John> The main area of thought I think is needed is how do you John> create a good type system and genericity on top of the Joy John> basis. I don't know much about Joy yet, but must say that I do not like the idea of typing systems as it is usually used. I may repeat myself, but I have to say that to me typing are just pre/post conditions that may help a compiler at producing more efficient code, or prove that a piece of code is correct or not. -- Laurent Martelli martelli@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes): 00071, btanksley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Separation of concerns: 00071, Laurent Martelli |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes)i: 00071, John Carter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes): 00071, Massimo Dentico |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |