logo       

Re: Busy Bees!: msg#00058

os.tunes

Subject: Re: Busy Bees!

I repost this because I don't see it on the list.

I have written:
>
> zccap74 wrote:
> >
> > For those that haven't looked at maude or cafeOBJ recently, this is what
> > people
> > have been up to...
> > What I'd STILL like to know is; what can these two languages NOT do? What
> > makes
> > them unsuitable as languages for tunes? Personally, I can't see anything
> > that
> > makes them unsuitable. They implement good reflection, coinductive and
> > inductive
> > techniques, and can support any logic mentioned in the posts over the last
> > few
> > months. I guess what I'm trying to get is a response from someone saying
> > either
> > 'yes I'll look at it' or 'it's not suitable for these reasons'
> > The ball is in your court guys!
>
> I'm reading the documentation, in particular I'm interested in the
> notion of "Behavioral Satisfaction" but honestly I'm not qualified
> to express a strong opinion like "it's (not) suitable for these
> reasons". Currently I'm looking in different directions and I'm
> trying to learn as much as possible.

Best regards,

--
Massimo Dentico



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise