|
Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes): msg#00051os.tunes
>>>>> "Massimo" == Massimo Dentico <m.dentico@xxxxxxxx> writes: Massimo> Surely OIL is not so big compared to other interpreters but Massimo> you need a C++ compiler to bootstrap it and an host OS to Massimo> run it (as the vast majority of the existing interpreters Massimo> and compilers). The need of C++ compiler is just an implementation issue. i could very have written in assemblor, and it would be as portable. At that point, it would be fairly easy to compile OIL into a "kernel" that can bootstrap on bare hardware. But I don't see any need for this. At least now. I just felt that to start with, C++ was a good compromise between portability and efficiency. -- Laurent Martelli martelli@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: A mathematical foundation of reflexion?: 00051, Laurent Martelli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes): 00051, James Little |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes)i: 00051, Massimo Dentico |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lambda (was: Refactoring in Tunes): 00051, Massimo Dentico |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |