|
Re: Plan9 VM for Windows/Linux?: msg#00616os.plan9.general
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Dan Cross wrote: > > Well, the word here is that the Hammer series are "IA-64" *only* if > > you want it to be. By jumper or switch on the mainboard, you'll be > > able to choose x86 mode, or native RISC. > > Great, yet another mode bit. Only this one has to be physically > manipulated! > > > See Doc drool.... > > Because it's a dumb idea, right? Only if you're a fan of x86's "backward-compatible-forever" philosophy. I'm looking forward to seeing an AMD processor that isn't saddled with all of Intel's cruft. Just out of curiosity, what do you have against running a CPU with its own native instruction set? Oh, wait. I'm sorry, my mistake. It won't run *Windows* in native mode. Therefore, it *must* have been a stupid idea, right? Doc |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: fs hardware configuration: 00616, Skip Tavakkolian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: fs hardware configuration: 00616, Nigel Roles |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Plan9 VM for Windows/Linux?i: 00616, Dan Cross |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Plan9 VM for Windows/Linux?: 00616, Dan Cross |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |