logo       

Re: dynamic loading, was "Ugly Q, I admit": msg#00586

os.plan9.general

Subject: Re: dynamic loading, was "Ugly Q, I admit"


----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucio De Re" <lucio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
> I remember loadable device drivers being mooted a while back.

It was on the list for 4th edition (rob was a fan) but too much was
going on in many ways for it to have a chance. I might bring my
Inferno model into a private plan9 kernel and see if I like it.

> Shared library are a curse, but until everyone sees them in that
> light, they'll be with us for a long time to come. It's a fashion
> thing.

A fashion? I wish it would die. But then again my wardrobe says
something about doing something for the helluva it.

> I never even remotely dared hope there'd be Plan 9 for the PS2. Can I
> start dreaming? Shall I spend some money and offer to help?

No need to dream. The jump from the Inferno port to a plan9 port
is largely known territory. It's just a whacky mips and so if you are
willing to get the mmu/tlb stuff right then you are almost there. The
most interesting part is deciding what to do about graphics. /dev/draw
would be an easy way out (the linux guys just went for a slow X) but
the chip is more fun than that.

brucee



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise