|
Re: dynamic loading, was "Ugly Q, I admit": msg#00575os.plan9.general
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Ronald G. Minnich wrote: > Actually there is some step in plan 9 that makes my PCs take forever to > boot. Don't know what it is. But they don't typically boot faster than > Linux for me. > i can't speak for anything that i don't have, but my p9 installation boots on par with freebsd (~34 seconds, freebsd does not have the 10 second delay before bootstrapping the kernel) to fully functional network-enabled node (including X). if i had a file server p9 would boot even faster. the only difference is that i log into p9, while freebds just prompts me for one... i strongly believe that boot time is only essential with terminals (which do get to be rebooted more often) and that with LinuxBIOS-enabled kernel it won't be hard at all to get the boot time down to linux levels on a reasonable hardware. i plan to prove myself wrong someday :) andrey ps: your p9 machine isn't trying to dhcp itself in the presence of no dhcp servers? |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: v9fs release: 00575, Russ Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: dynamic loading, was "Ugly Q, I admit": 00575, Bruce Ellis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dynamic loading, was "Ugly Q, I admit"i: 00575, Ronald G. Minnich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dynamic loading, was "Ugly Q, I admit": 00575, okamoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |