|
Re: Plan9 VM for Windows/Linux?: msg#00558os.plan9.general
Doc Shipley wrote: > On 26 Nov 2002, Keith Nash wrote: > > > > Does anyone know of an inexpensive architecture that would virtualize > > > notably easier than x86? I don't think I've read of any attempts on > > > PPC, Sparc or MIPS, though someone must have tried... > > > > I remember reading that AMD's IA-64/Hammer/Opteron platform fixes some of > > the x86's virtualisation problems. Of course, you can't buy one yet. > > Well, the word here is that the Hammer series are "IA-64" *only* if > you want it to be. By jumper or switch on the mainboard, you'll be > able to choose x86 mode, or native RISC. I think you'll find that that was a mistype of AA-64 (i.e. x86-64), the Hammer/Opteron cores are not capable of executing Itanic instruction bundles. -- Wishing you good fortune, --Robin Kay-- (komadori) |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Ugly Q, I admit: 00558, Bruce Ellis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Plan9 VM for Windows/Linux?: 00558, Martin C . Atkins |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Plan9 VM for Windows/Linux?i: 00558, Doc Shipley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Plan9 VM for Windows/Linux?: 00558, Dan Cross |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |