|
Re: automated installs and some ports: msg#00391os.openbsd.ports
It was a beautiful Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:43, when Marc Espie said: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 10:05:19PM +0100, franciszek holop wrote: > > as i am going thru stuff i notice that some ports > > try to be civilised and use the pager to show info > > about the port. but in bulk installs like this it stops > > the process. > > > > so what should be the policy here? maybe it would be nice > > to start an install and go for a coffee, so if no errors > > are present every package would be at its place.... > > > > or can i just set the $PAGER to something phony? > > This is a known issue. This won't be changed for OpenBSD 3.5, but yes, > I know we can do something better there. Many ports use INSTALL/DEINSTALL scripts that echo all the important stuff instead of using MESSAGE. No $PAGER involved, seems good to me. -- _ ( ) ASCII Ribbon Campaign X against HTML email / \ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RFC: initial syweb port: 00391, Willem Dijkstra |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: automated installs and some ports: 00391, Benny Siegert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: automated installs and some portsi: 00391, Marc Espie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: automated installs and some ports: 00391, Benny Siegert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |