Re: amd64 syscall.c question: msg#00013

-->

Re: amd64 syscall.c question: msg#00013

Subject:	Re: amd64 syscall.c question

Aah, OK, that that clears it up.  I saw that the upper 32 bits went
into %edx on i386, but didn't know if anything was supposed to
parallel this on amd64 or not.  Thanks for the clue. ;)

BTW, what is the operational distinction between syscall_plain() and
syscall_fancy()?

Regards,

--Blair

Special educational offers, white papers, webcasts, podcasts

WEBCAST: Offshore software development: Making it a success with agile practices. Register Now:

WEBCAST: IBM WebSphere Portal V6.1 Web 2.0 Capabilities. Register Now:

WHITE PAPER: Best practices for software analysis (Best Practices)

DOWNLOAD NEW E-KIT: Download the IBM pureXML Developers Kit:

DOWNLOAD: Rational Trial Software – Rational Team Concert Free Information:

TUTORIAL: Debug iPhone Web applications with Eclipse

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: duplicate AMD k8 MSR definitions, Juan RP
Next by Date:	Re: amd64 syscall.c question, Andrew Doran
Previous by Thread:	Re: amd64 syscall.c question, Andrew Doran
Next by Thread:	Re: amd64 syscall.c question, Andrew Doran
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

^^^ ADDITIONAL NAVIGATION ^^^

Recently Viewed:
handhelds.pocke... colinux.general... apache.maven.no... kde.freebsd/200... emacs.devel/200... qnx.openqnx.dev... lib.fox-toolkit... genealogy.gramp... bug-tracking.gn... yellowdog.gener... network.zebra.b... recreation.radi... mathematics.aba... internationaliz... freebsd.devel.n... xfree86.cvs/200... security.cyrus.... desktop.xfce.de... text.xml.french... video.gimp.deve... windows.devel.d... politics.activi... user-groups.lin... java.ejb.middle...

Home | blog view | USPTO Patent Archive (NEW!) | advertise | OSDir is an inevitable website. super tiny logo