|
Re: Building hpcboot with eVC++4: msg#00009os.netbsd.ports.hpcmips
Rafal Boni wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:36:07AM +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote: >> ARMV4 name is confusing (b/c of ARMv4 instruction set). Note that all >> other toolchain templates use the same names already, so I think it's >> better to use plain "ARM" (etc) for eVC4 too. > > I had another thought re: this last night... although eVC++ 4 needs the > new target names, it might make sense to at least preserve the names of > the directories the resulting binaries go in.. That I can easily do if > people feel there's value in that. > > Also, from a look at the supported MIPS systems on the hpcmips page, it > looks like the correct MIPS target for eVC++ 4 should be "MIPS II", so > I'll add the templates for that as well when I get a few idle moments. Is there a possibility to compile in MIPS I mode?? > > --rafal > risto |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Building hpcboot with eVC++4: 00009, Rafal Boni |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Building hpcboot with eVC++4: 00009, Rafal Boni |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Building hpcboot with eVC++4i: 00009, Rafal Boni |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Building hpcboot with eVC++4: 00009, Rafal Boni |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |