|
Re: fault?: msg#00300os.netbsd.help
hi, i am sorry you feel offended. let me clarify my statement a bit. On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:37:21PM +0100, Nicolas Saurbier wrote: > I don´t want to stress anybody...If you don´t want to answer, then let > it be... but if it´s as simple as adding one line to rc.conf, then > why not write it in a mail like Frederick Bruckman (thanx) did??? because you didn't ask question which Frederick Bruckman answered to. you asked what's wrong and i told you. > And how should I know, if something is an "essential change" if I > don´t know what I´m doing? If I knew exactly what I´m doing, I > wouldn´t need your help...I thought, this mailing-list is for people, > who have problems, and how should I learn NetBSD, if NetBSD-guys dare > to answer??? "If I knew exactly what I´m doing, I wouldn´t need your help" that's exactly my point. basically you can help people in two ways, 1) answering their exact questions, which makes them happy but this is only short-term solution (*) because they will come back next time they face any new problem. 2) show them how they can help themselves so next time they don't need you, netbsd-help or anyone else and they can figure out what to do by reading documentation, thinking about the problem from different points of view, trying to get the whole situation in more complex way - making them _self-contained_ it's nice that people on netbsd-help offer even type 1) answers and there are exceptions such as (*) problems you can't easily figure out yourself (e.g. bugs in documentation or code). but users also should realize that they need to try to help themselves in the first place to save NetBSD-guys more free time which they can spend on making NetBSD better system to use.. there is plenty of documentation you can read, most of them are accessible from http://NetBSD.org/Documentation/, manual pages and even source code which usually has lots of explanations in comments. NetBSD is one of the best documented systems available out there. you can also check articles at BSD Devcenter at ONLamp.com (many of them are written with FreeBSD in mind but applies from 99% to NetBSD as well), e.g.: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2000/10/04/FreeBSD_Basics.html http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2000/10/11/FreeBSD_Basics.html or "A Tour Through the NetBSD Source Tree" written by Hubert Feyrer if you want to know what's where in the sources: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200203/netbsdsrctree1.html http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200204/netbsdsrctree2.html http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200205/netbsdsrctree3.html the point is that nobody will make you self-contained, you have to. regards, -- -- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@xxxxxxxxxxx> ASCII Ribbon campaign against /"\ -- -- <salo@xxxxxxxxxxx> e-mail in gratuitous HTML and \ / -- -- Microsoft proprietary formats X -- -- PGPkey: http://Xtrmntr.org/salo.pgp / \ -- -- Key Fingerprint: 75B2 2B96 CD75 0385 1C49 39B8 8B08 C30E 54BC 7263 --
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: starting order of /etc/rc.d/*: 00300, Perry E. Metzger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | AW: fault?: 00300, Nicolas Saurbier |
| Previous by Thread: | AW: fault?i: 00300, Nicolas Saurbier |
| Next by Thread: | AW: fault?: 00300, Nicolas Saurbier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |