|
Re: keep support for gcc 2.95 in NetBSD 1.6.x?: msg#00284os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.user
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 11:05:08AM +0100, Klaus Heinz wrote: > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:20:00AM +0100, Klaus Heinz wrote: > > > are we supposed to keep existing patches for compatibility with gcc 2.95? > > > > As other platforms lack C99 compilers, it would be appreciated. > > Ah, you want to say that we should keep the package buildable with gcc > 2.95 because that's the only compiler available on some platforms? No, more like "The commercial compilers of some platforms have a similiar feature set". > This is the crucial point. There are some patches for compatibility with > gcc 2.95 but they do not apply anymore and I would have to build with > this compiler to identify how to change them and whether there are new > patches necessary. What I wanted to say is: don't bother too much. Joerg |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: keep support for gcc 2.95 in NetBSD 1.6.x?: 00284, Klaus Heinz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | DragonFly, xmms-musepack: 00284, Armin Arh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: keep support for gcc 2.95 in NetBSD 1.6.x?i: 00284, Klaus Heinz |
| Next by Thread: | pksrc variable MAIL_CMD not defined for NetBSD 3.1???: 00284, Mark E. Perkins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |