|
Re: pkg/23425: msg#01444os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.bugs
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:49:09AM -0500, Rob Quinn wrote: >> (1) it already prints out a warning saying that it might not work and >> then tries anyway. case in point, my 2.99.14 lsof works fine on >> 2.99.16. i'll try it on 3.99.1 tomorrow. :) >> (2) if we make it refuse to work if the kernel version is different, >> we eliminate a great many cases where it might work anyway. > > I don't want to force either to stop working, I would just like them to show >up in "lintpkgsrc -i" as out of date. well, i wouldn't be opposed to doing something like this: -PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME:S/_/-/} +PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME:S/_/-/}-${OS_VERSION} if that would work properly and have the desired effect (and little to no side-effects), but be forewarned -- if you use the -E/-I options of lintpkgsrc, this won't show up as out of date quite so readily. -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| codewarrior@xxxxxxxxxx * "ah! i see you have the internet twofsonet@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" werdna@xxxxxxxxxxxx * "information is power -- share the wealth." |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: pkg/28925: 01444, David H . Gutteridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pkg/29798 (fixed in jhead 2.38): 01444, Arto Selonen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pkg/23425i: 01444, Rob Quinn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pkg/23425: 01444, Rob Quinn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |