|
Re: [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ?: msg#00161os.freebsd.devel.alpha
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:08:54AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:09:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On 2002-Oct-29 09:55:49 +1030, "Wilkinson,Alex" > > <Alex.Wilkinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >Do the benifits from a having a larger disk cache such as the "WD > > >40GB 7200RPM w/8MB Cache" has, outweigh the benefits of Tagged > > >Command Queuing ? > > > > This is somewhat off-topic for -alpha... > > To bring it back to alpha. > I noticed that setting values in kernel.conf are ignored on -current > alpha. > I had to change the drivers default value to get tagged queueing. I meant loader.conf, but shortly after writing this I've found the reason. There was a very old stall loader.rc on that machine. So - yes it works now - sorry for confusion. Shouldn't mergemaster take care of loader.rc? -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@xxxxxxxxx Usergroup info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ?: 00161, Bernd Walter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | -current testers needed (no-destructive test): 00161, Poul-Henning Kamp |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ?i: 00161, Bernd Walter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ?: 00161, Terry Lambert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |