|
Re: [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ?: msg#00157os.freebsd.devel.alpha
On 2002-Oct-29 09:55:49 +1030, "Wilkinson,Alex" <Alex.Wilkinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Do the benifits from a having a larger disk cache such as the "WD >40GB 7200RPM w/8MB Cache" has, outweigh the benefits of Tagged >Command Queuing ? This is somewhat off-topic for -alpha... The quick answer is: "Not if you value your data". The longer answer is: Without tagged queueing, the device driver cannot determine when the data for a particular write command has been committed to the media (as against just being stored in the cache). Soft-updates (in particular) relies on accurate write ordering to ensure that the filesystem on disk is always consistent. Having a volatile cache in the disk breaks this assumption - if you have a power failure, you don't know what was lost. The safe states are: tagging & caching or no-caching (which is slow). Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ?: 00157, Wilkinson,Alex |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ?: 00157, Peter Wemm |
| Previous by Thread: | [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ?i: 00157, Wilkinson,Alex |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ?: 00157, Peter Wemm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |