Re: trouvé sur un blog de la communauté PHP

On 10/23/06, Guillaume Paumier 
<guillom.pom-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Salut
>
>
> On 10/23/06, Christophe Gesché 
> <christophe-zRQJvlMk3rMdnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Aaron est un techno journaliste :
> >
> http://www.wormus.com/aaron/stories/2006/10/19/why-wikipedia-should-remove-themselves-from-search-engines.html
> >
> > Why Wikipedia should remove themselves from Search Engines
> > Filed under: Conspiracy, Internet, Google, SEO — Aaron Wormus @ 7:54 am
> >
> > This is an extension to my latest comment on this blog entry.
> >
> > If you search for just about any term in google, you will find that if a
> > wikipedia entry exists it will be ranked among the top few entries.
> >
> > This exposes a flaw in the concept of Google search algorithms, as
> > despite the quality of the content of the page, simply because it exists
> > on wikipedia and is well linked within the framework of the site, it
> > gets shuffled to the top of the google search page results.
> >
> > Creating a page which is within the first page of the biggest search
> > engine freely editable by anyone with any agenda is just asking for abuse.
> >
> > Del.icio.us has been pretty free of spam and spammy links. The reason
> > for this is their very logical decision not to allow search engines to
> > index the pages by adding the following metatag.
> >
> > <meta name="robots"
> content="noarchive,nofollow,noindex"/>
> >
> > If wikipedia would do this it would solve a LOT of problems. The fact
> > that wikipedia ranks so well not only means that objectionable content
> > often floats to the top of the search engine rankings, but you also get
> > a lot more random people who surf in through google (most likely looking
> > for information) and end up editing the article and bringing the quality
> > down.
> >
> > So this is a callout to wikipedia, please get your pages out of google
> > and work towards refining your content rather than being a nesting
> > ground for link spammers, people with personal agendas and random vandals.
>
> Pour les non anglophones, en résumé : quelqu'un estime que Wikipédia devrait
> d'elle-même interdire l'indexation de ses pages par les moteurs de
> recherche, afin d'une part, d'éviter que des pages contenant des erreurs
> arrivent dans les premiers résultats de google, et d'autre part afin de
> réduire le vandalisme.
>
> Rien de nouveau sous le soleil, à mon avis (qui n'engage que moi :)
>

sisi, ça aurait un gros avantage : les gens utiliseraient le moteur de
recherche de Wikipédia, bien plus puissant, perfectionné, à jour et
surtout bien plus adapté à wikipédia que des pauvres algorithmes
génériques pour le web que font google ou yahoo. :D

Plyd