|
Re: Suggestion: Batch validation: msg#00071org.w3c.validator
scripsit Marc-Andre Roberge: > I have been using your service to validate the code of some 90 pages. > Wouldn't it be nice to be able to validate the content of the entire local > root directory of a site in one pass and see a basic report of which files > did not validate in order to focus only on the problematic files? I agree, that is a very useful feature. For now, I use the WDG HTML Validator [1] for batch jobs. It is a true validator and will in general give equally good results to the W3C validator. It's maintained by Liam Quinn, who's also on this list. 1. <http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/> -- This e-mail was brought to you by the number e. Thanasis Kinias Doctoral Student, Department of History Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A. Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul, Ash nazg thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: http://validator.w3.org/ bug with <style id>: 00071, Masayasu Ishikawa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Suggestion: Batch validation: 00071, Bjoern Hoehrmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Suggestion: Batch validationi: 00071, Marc-Andre Roberge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Suggestion: Batch validation: 00071, Bjoern Hoehrmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |