|
Re: possible bug in the validator?: msg#00028org.w3c.validator
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Lloyd Wood wrote: > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Nick Kew wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Thanasis Kinias wrote: > > > > > IMHO it's broken simply because a huge amount of Web content is deployed > > > by developers/designers who have no control over their servers. > > > > Erm, for Apache-hosted sites (i.e. the majority) it's more likely to > > be ignorance than control that's at issue. An author who knows about > > HTTP headers can (usually) control them with a .htaccess file. > > Yeah, I've had an AddDefaultCharset ISO-8859-1 in a top-level dir I'll > have to remove to make way for the single page with a meta charset tag > of a different type. Why don't you just use an AddCharset directive for that single page? -- Liam Quinn |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: possible bug in the validator?: 00028, Nick Kew |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re[2]: possible bug in the validator?: 00028, Vojtech Rynda |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: possible bug in the validator?i: 00028, Liam Quinn |
| Next by Thread: | checklink: "radio" input type is an anchor?: 00028, David Pritchard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |