Download Firefox: WindowsMac OS X
logo       
Google Custom Search
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Re: HTTP Patch proposal: msg#00031

Subject: Re: HTTP Patch proposal

Which makes sense; HTTP's lack of support for mandatory extensions makes
deploying these kinds of extensions difficult.  So the options seem to
be;

- PATCH
- M-PUT (RFC 2774) + RFC 3229
- a PUT binding for SOAP + RFC 3229

FWIW, if there was anything for the TAG to consider here, it might be to
document some best practices for deploying various forms of HTTP
extensions and to help protocol developers understand the tradeoffs.

PATCH was part of the original HTTP/1.1 proposal.  It was removed only
due to lack of implementation experience.  As far as I am concerned,
it is already part of HTTP -- just not standardized yet.

....Roy




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>