Re: Low-level XML Protocol activity announced by the XCP Consortium

"By implementing ><CP, and thereby increasing the need for bandwidth,
service providers can 'Light the Fiber"sm"

I thought SPAM was already doing that.

WM

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@xxxxxx>
To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <www-tag@xxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: Low-level XML Protocol activity announced by the XCP Consortium


|
| On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 09:36, Shane McCarron wrote:
| [...]
| > I guess I would appreciate it if the TAG, in its role as keepers of
| > the internet architecture, could examine the XCP architecture at
| > http://www.x-cp.org and think about ways that it can be enhanced to
| > become more consistent with the W3C's view of the web.
|
| Ah... yes, indeed. Light the Fiber! Can't just leave
| so much of it dark.
|
| I'm chairing the telcon on Monday. Tag members, please be
| prepared to discuss X-CP on Monday.
|
|
| -- 
| Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
| see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
|
|
| __________ NOD32 1.701 (20040401) Information __________
|
| This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
| http://www.nod32.com
|
|