|
|
December 31, 2002
- SemWeb use case for issue httpRange-14, Sandro Hawke
- RE: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, David Orchard
- Re: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude), Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude), Jeremy Dunck
- Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Walden Mathews
- RE: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude), Julian Reschke
- Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Mark Baker
- RE: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, David Orchard
- content negotiation anti-principle, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude), Simon St.Laurent
- RE: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Dare Obasanjo
- Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Roy T. Fielding
- Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Sandro Hawke
- Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Mark Baker
December 30, 2002
- Re: Content negotiation issues (was XInclude), Jeremy Dunck
- Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
- Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Sandro Hawke
- Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Sandro Hawke
- RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR, Simon St.Laurent
- RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR, David Orchard
- Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Mark Baker
- [Internet-Drafts@xxxxxxxx: I-D ACTION:draft-connolly-w3c-accessible-registries-00.txt], Mark Baker
- Re: WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Mark Baker
- RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR, Simon St.Laurent
- RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR, David Orchard
- WebArch Ambiguity about Objects, PLUS Suggested Major Replacement, Sandro Hawke
- Content negotiation issues (was XInclude), Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR, MURATA Makoto
- Re: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR, Daniel Veillard
December 19, 2002
- Comments on arch document (15 November draft), Mark Nottingham
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Simon St.Laurent
- RE: uri-comp draft necessary?, Dare Obasanjo
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Paul Prescod
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Miles Sabin
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Bill de hÓra
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Paul Prescod
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Paul Prescod
- RE: uri-comp draft necessary?, Julian Reschke
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Bill de hÓra
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Stefan Eissing
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Miles Sabin
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, noah_mendelsohn
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Bill de hÓra
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Miles Sabin
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Peter C Davis
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Stefan Eissing
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Stefan Eissing
- RE: uri-comp draft necessary?, Misha Wolf
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Miles Sabin
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Miles Sabin
- RE: uri-comp draft necessary?, Dan Connolly
- RE: uri-comp draft necessary?, David Orchard
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Jeremy Dunck
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Paul Prescod
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, noah_mendelsohn
December 18, 2002
- Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF, Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Mark Nottingham
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Paul Grosso
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Miles Sabin
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Tim Bray
- RE: uri-comp draft necessary?, Dare Obasanjo
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Paul Prescod
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Paul Prescod
- RE: uri-comp draft necessary?, Dare Obasanjo
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: uri-comp draft necessary?, Misha Wolf
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Robin Berjon
- Re: [URIEquivalence-15] %hh escapes (was: [Minutes] 16 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf), Stefan Eissing
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Stefan Eissing
- [URIEquivalence-15] %hh escapes (was: [Minutes] 16 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf), Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Bjoern Hoehrmann
- re: uri-comp draft necessary?, Simon St.Laurent
- uri-comp draft necessary?, Tim Bray
December 13, 2002
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Martin Duerst
- Re: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs", Tim Bray
- Re: Section 4; is REST's uniform interface constraint a "principle"?, Mark Baker
- Re: Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs", Stefan Eissing
- Draft 2 of "How to Compare URIs", Tim Bray
- Re: how to specify a URL in a Schema?, Tim Bray
- Re: Section 4; is REST's uniform interface constraint a "principle"?, Mike Champion
- RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", noah_mendelsohn
- Section 4; is REST's uniform interface constraint a "principle"?, Mark Baker
- how to specify a URL in a Schema?, Jeff Sonstein
December 11, 2002
- RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", Larry Masinter
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- [binaryXML-30] Binary Infosets, Robin Berjon
- Re: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", noah_mendelsohn
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Robin Berjon
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Robin Berjon
- Re: Are the chapters of webarch in the wrong order, Dan Connolly
- Re: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces?, Robin Berjon
- RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document names paces?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces?, Tim Bray
- Re: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", Scott Lawrence
- re: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", Rich Salz
December 10, 2002
- re: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", Larry Masinter
- Re: Editorial questions about first three findings, Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: Editorial questions about first three findings, Mark Baker
- Re: Editorial questions about first three findings, Ian B. Jacobs
- Editorial questions about first three findings, Mark Baker
- RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", Williams, Stuart
- RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces?, Chris Wilper
- RE: XML-*, noah_mendelsohn
- Re: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces?, Dan Connolly
- Re: The RDDL challenge, Patrick Stickler
- Re: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces?, Tim Bray
- Are the chapters of webarch in the wrong order, Tim Bray
- Re: The RDDL challenge, Tim Berners-Lee
December 09, 2002
- RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document names paces?, David Orchard
- [Minutes] 9 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf (uriMediaType-9, namespaceDocument-8, xmlProfiles-29), Ian B. Jacobs
- RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces?, Dare Obasanjo
- RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document names paces?, Williams, Stuart
- RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces?, Dan Connolly
- RE: what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces?, David Orchard
- what's wrong with using XML Schema/HTML/RDF to document namespaces?, Dan Connolly
- RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", Paul Grosso
- RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", Dan Connolly
- RE: XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", David Orchard
- XMLP WG Response on "SOAP and the Internal Subset", David Fallside
- RE: XML-*, DPawson
December 06, 2002
- [Publication] 6 Dec 2002 Editor's Draft of Architecture of the WWW, Ian B. Jacobs
- RE: XML-*, Ann Navarro
- Re: XML-*, Norman Walsh
- Re: XML-*, Norman Walsh
- Re: XML-*, Tim Bray
- RE: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Joshua Allen
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Tim Bray
- Re: XML-*, noah_mendelsohn
- Re: XML-*, Norman Walsh
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Jeremy Dunck
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], noah_mendelsohn
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: RDDL Proposal from Jonathan Borden was: Re: RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray, Jonathan Borden
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RDDL Proposal from Jonathan Borden was: Re: RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray, Jonathan Borden
- RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments, Richard Tobin
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Roy T. Fielding
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], noah_mendelsohn
December 05, 2002
- RE: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments, Martin Duerst
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Tim Bray
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Jeremy Dunck
- Re: Commentary on 15 Nov Arch Doc WD, Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Martin Duerst
- Re: IRI-Everywhere (was RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI), Martin Duerst
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Michael Mealling
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Tim Bray
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Mark Nottingham
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Tim Bray
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Michael Mealling
- [Agenda] 9 Dec 2002 TAG teleconf, Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Martin Duerst
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Martin Duerst
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
December 04, 2002
- Re: XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Martin Duerst
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Martin Duerst
- XML-* [was: ... XML subsetting...], Paul Grosso
- subsetting XML (was Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002), Simon St.Laurent
- RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), David Orchard
- Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), Tim Bray
- What Is the Product of this Task? (WAS RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metad ata in URIs)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), Paul Grosso
- RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), David Orchard
- Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), Paul Grosso
- Re:generic linking, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: generic linking, Paul Grosso
- Re: generic linking, Simon St.Laurent
- Re:generic linking, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), Ian B. Jacobs
- RE: RDDL proposal from Chris Wilper, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), Ian B. Jacobs
- IRI-Everywhere (was RE: last call comments, usage of IRI rather than URI), jeremy carroll
- RE: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), Paul Cotton
- RDDL proposal from Chris Wilper, Chris Wilper
December 03, 2002
- Re: Generic link handling, Tim Bray
- [Announcement] TAG Town Hall meeting at XML 2002 Conference, Paul Cotton
- Re: Generic link handling, Norman Walsh
- Re: Generic link handling, Simon St.Laurent
- Summary of TAG activity from 5 Nov 2002 to 3 Dec 2002, Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Norman Walsh
- Re: Generic link handling, Norman Walsh
- RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray, Tim Bray
- Re: Generic link handling, Paul Prescod
- Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), Paul Grosso
- [metadataInURI-31] Should metadata (e.g., versioning information) be encoded in URIs?, Ian B. Jacobs
- [binaryXML-30] Standardize a "binary XML" format?, Ian B. Jacobs
- [xmlProfiles-29] When, whither and how to profile W3C specifications in the XML Family, Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Miles Sabin
- Equivalence and multiple-role URIs (WAS: Posted draft of URI comparison finding), Miles Sabin
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Robin Berjon
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset, David Carlisle
- Re: RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray, Robin Berjon
- Re: RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray, Patrick Stickler
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Tim Bray
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Michael Mealling
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Tim Bray
- RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray, Tim Bray
- [Minutes] 2 Dec 2002 TAG teleconference (New issues: XML subsetting, Binary XML, metadata in URIs), Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Michael Mealling
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Champion, Mike
December 02, 2002
- RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset, Dan Connolly
- Re: binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Tim Bray
- RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset, Dare Obasanjo
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset, Tim Bray
- Re: Generic link handling, Simon St.Laurent
- binaryXML, marshalling, and and trust boundaries, Dan Connolly
- RE: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Dan Connolly
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Chris Lilley
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Dan Connolly
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Kian-Tat Lim
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Larry Masinter
- Re: Generic link handling, Chris Lilley
- RE: Generic link handling, Ann Navarro
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Tim Bray
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Chris Lilley
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Chris Lilley
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Michael Mealling
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Dan Connolly
- Mail archive corruption [was: Posted draft of URI comparison finding], Misha Wolf
- Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding, Chris Lilley
- Re: Generic link handling, Chris Lilley
- Re: SOAP's prohibiting use of XML internal subset, Paul Prescod
|
|
